4/9/12

via FDL

Falling Coverage Rates: One Reason Government Surveys May Not Show a Rise in Poverty

By: Dean Baker Sunday April 8, 2012 7:39 am
hope less (photo: Daniel*1977/flickr)
In a NYT Economic blogpost Jason DeParle ponders the fact that government surveys are not showing much increase in poverty, even though we know there are many people experiencing long periods of unemployment and many forms of government assistance have been cut back. One possible explanation is that people in poverty and extreme poverty are less likely to be covered by the survey.
My colleague, John Schmitt, found clear evidence of a coverage problem in comparing employment rates as shown in the 2000 Census and the overlapping months of the Current Population Survey (CPS). This is a useful check on the accuracy of the CPS, the main survey for measuring both unemployment and poverty, since the Census has near universal reach with a response rate of close to 99 percent. By comparison, the coverage rate for the CPS is close to 88 percent.
Even after applying a Census adjustment formula, Schmitt still found a substantial difference in employment rates, with the CPS showing an overall employment rate that was more than a full percentage point higher than the Census. The difference was largest for groups with the lowest coverage rates. In the case of young African American men, who have a coverage rate of close to two-thirds, the CPS showed an employment rate that was 8 percentage points higher than the Census for the same months of 2000.
These results are consistent with a story where the CPS is missing more people through time and the people who it misses are disproportionately at the bottom of the income ladder. If this is true, then there could be a rise in poverty that is largely missed in the standard surveys.
###
Comcast's shifting explanations for its Xbox deal raise questions about the justification for its bandwidth caps and the different ways it charges consumers for video.
Matt Wood, CNet
Cable giant Comcast's efforts to secure passage of the defeated Stop Online Piracy Act provided a boost to the company's lobbyists.
Andrew Feinberg, The Hill
In the wake of SOPA and PIPA, there is yet another terrifying bill on the table. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) is currently being discussed in Congress. It is feared that CISPA is far worse than SOPA and PIPA in its possible effects on the Internet.
Anne Sewell, Digital Journal
An online activist site has collected 300,000 signatures in opposition to a pending "cyber-security" bill that critics say would allow increased government spying on the Internet. The petition focuses on a bill by Rep. Mike Rogers, but his legislation is one of at least four proposals now being considered by Congress.
Timothy B. Lee, Ars Technica
You can still write annoying, profane things about this story -- at least for now. Arizona legislators are expected to amend a controversial bill that experts say could stifle free speech online and violate the First Amendment. But free speech experts say the anticipated changes to the bill -- which will be made before the legislation is sent to Gov. Jan Brewer -- may not fix the major flaws in the proposal, which passed both legislative houses last week.
Bianca Bosker, Huffington Post

The government is moving forward with a plan to make local television stations post information about political advertising on a central website. Owners of local stations have tried to block the proposal, but it appears likely to be approved by the FCC when it convenes later this month.
Brian Stelter, New York Times
Broadcast television stations would soon be required to disclose on the Internet the rates they charge for political TV ads under new rules circulated at the FCC.
Amy Schatz, Wall Street Journal
The FCC late last week released its tentative agenda for its April 27 public meeting and it will be a busy one. There are votes scheduled on Universal Service Reform, noncommercial station fundraising and a regulatory framework for allowing TV stations to share channels as part of the reclamation of spectrum for incentive auctions. The disclosure rulemaking is also on the agenda.
John Eggerton, Multichannel News

Everyone knows how long a minute is. And your cellphone carrier keeps close tabs on how many you have used this month. Now, in the smartphone era, more people are being forced to think about how many megabytes of data they are using. But what exactly is a megabyte?
Brian X. Chen, New York Times
We've all heard the commercials and seen the ads. The major cellular carriers are rolling out their shiny new 4G networks, and they're promising speeds "up to 10 times faster" than those on regular 3G networks. They also toss the term "LTE" around as if it were going out of style. For most people, 4G feels a little faster, but it's not anything close to the speed we were promised.
Ed Robinson, GigaOM
Starting April 8, AT&T will allow iPhone customers whose contracts have expired to unlock their phones, or remove the restrictions that bind them to the carrier.
Jenna Wortham, New York Times
In a first for the microblogging service, Twitter has gone to court in an effort to rid its site of spam.
Wendy Davis, MediaPost
Google wants to bring more small websites to mobile phones, and to help nudge those sites along it's willing to foot the bill for a year. Google, with the help of mobile Web optimization startup Duda Mobile, is offering for 12 months free hosting and website customization for mobile browsers in an effort to make more Internet content mobile-friendly.
Kevin Fitchard, GigaOM

Last week, the Center for Media Justice and Free Press, together with the Main Street Project, Waite House and the Headwaters Foundation for Justice, welcomed author Joseph Torres to the Twin Cities to promote his book News for All the People: The Epic Story of Race and the American Media, co-written with Juan González. The timing for Joseph's visit to Minnesota couldn't have been more perfect.
amalia deloney, SavetheNews.org
Television news now feasts on fame, the gaudier the better, with journalistic credentials a mere afterthought. Morning shows must compete with YouTube, Twitter, iPads and a thousand other distractions. That's why they keep panting after the celebrity du jour, even one who claims to despise the lamestream media.
Howard Kurtz, Daily Beast
If most newspapers are an uneconomical proposition incapable of sustaining profits, let alone paying off the debt so many buyers have larded on them, who is left to own them? Rich guys.
David Carr, New York Times
Mike Wallace, the CBS reporter who became one of America's best-known broadcast journalists as an interrogator of the famous and infamous on 60 Minutes, died on Saturday. He was 93.
Tim Weiner, New York Times

4/6/12


Via:Naked Capitalism
Posted: 01 Mar 2012 09:05 PM PST

By Washington’s Blog
Two Senators with Access to Classified Information Say Saudi Government Backed 9/11 Attack
Two former senators – one a 9/11 Commissioner, the other the co-chair of the joint Congressional inquiry into 9/11 – state in sworn declarations that the Saudi government backed the 9/11 attack.
The New York Times reports:
For more than a decade, questions have lingered about the possible role of the Saudi government in the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, even as the royal kingdom has made itself a crucial counterterrorism partner in the eyes of American diplomats.
Now, in sworn statements that seem likely to reignite the debate, two former senators who were privy to top secret information on the Saudis’ activities say they believe that the Saudi government might have played a direct role in the terrorist attacks.
“I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia,” former Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, said in an affidavit filed as part of a lawsuit brought against the Saudi government and dozens of institutions in the country by families of Sept. 11 victims and others. Mr. Graham led a joint 2002 Congressional inquiry into the attacks.
As we noted last year:
The Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, previously stated that an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here).
Today, Graham called for a new 9/11 investigation. As Raw Story notes:
Graham on Monday called on the U.S. government to reopen its investigation into 9/11 after a report found that links between Saudi Arabia and the hijackers were never disclosed by the FBI to the 2002 joint Congressional intelligence committee investigating the attacks.
“In the final report of the congressional inquiry, there was a chapter related primarily to the Saudi role in 9/11 that was totally censored, every word of the chapter has been withheld from the public,” Graham said on MSNBC’s The Dylan Ratigan Show.
“Some of the other questions we ought to be asking are if we know that the Saudis who lived in San Diego and now apparently in Sarasota received substantial assistance, what about the Saudis who lived in Phoenix, Arizona? Or Arlington, Virginia? … What was happening in those places?”
“I believe these are questions for which there are definitive answers, but the American people and largely their elected representatives have been denied that information.”
The Times continues:
His former Senate colleague, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, a Democrat who served on the separate 9/11 Commission, said in a sworn affidavit of his own in the case that “significant questions remain unanswered” about the role of Saudi institutions. “Evidence relating to the plausible involvement of possible Saudi government agents in the September 11th attacks has never been fully pursued,” Mr. Kerrey said.
Their affidavits, which were filed on Friday and have not previously been disclosed, are part of a multibillion-dollar lawsuit that has wound its way through federal courts since 2002. An appellate court, reversing an earlier decision, said in November that foreign nations were not immune to lawsuits under certain terrorism claims, clearing the way for parts of the Saudi case to be reheard in United States District Court in Manhattan.
***
The Saudis are seeking to have the case dismissed in part because they say American inquiries — including those in which Mr. Graham and Mr. Kerrey took part — have essentially exonerated them. A recent court filing by the Saudis prominently cited the 9/11 Commission’s “exhaustive” final report, which “found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi individuals funded” Al Qaeda.
But Mr. Kerrey and Mr. Graham said that the findings should not be seen as an exoneration and that many important questions about the Saudis’ role had never been fully examined, partly because their panels simply did not have the time or resources given their wider scope.
Terry Strada of New Vernon, N.J., whose husband died in the World Trade Center, said it was “so absurd that it’s laughable” for the Saudis to claim that the federal inquiries had exonerated them.
Unanswered questions include the work of a number of Saudi-sponsored charities with financial links to Al Qaeda, as well as the role of a Saudi citizen living in San Diego at the time of the attacks, Omar al-Bayoumi, who had ties to two of the hijackers and to Saudi officials, Mr. Graham said in his affidavit.
Still, Washington has continued to stand behind Saudi Arabia publicly, with the Justice Department joining the kingdom in trying to have the lawsuits thrown out of court on the grounds that the Saudis are protected by international immunity.
As we’ve repeatedly noted:
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .” He also says that it might take “a permanent 9/11 commission” to end the remaining mysteries of September 11
Indeed, while everyone remembers the false allegations about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, most forget that the other primary justification for the war was the false linkage between Iraq and 9/11.
The failure to really investigate 9/11 led us into a disastrous war … which has virtually bankrupted our country.
Unfortunately, the endless wars in the Middle East and North Africa are about oil, not national security (and see this).
So we have idiots like MSNBC talking head Joe Scarborough saying that – even if the Saudi government backed the 9/11 attacks – Saudi oil is too important to do anything about it:

3/27/12

In a few days, we will gather for the National Occupation of Washington, DC. This spring, the focus will be on next steps to build an independent nonviolent movement for transformation of our society.  Participants will make connections with occupiers from around the country, will acquire skills, knowledge, ideas and resources for organizing in their local communities and will engage in direct action to bring attention to issues of concern to the 99%.

NOW DC will kick off with a march to the EPA for a rally to demand that the EPA does its job to protect people and the planet instead of protecting corporate profits and to stop the war on whistleblowers. Dr. Helen Caldicott and Ralph Nader will join whistleblowers Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo and Susan Morris at the rally. Noam Chomsky urges you to be there in this new video statement.

Over the weekend, we will join Occupy the Department of Education and the Backbone Campaign will hold a direct action training to plan for creative actions on foreclosure and college debt. On Saturday, March 31st, we hope to hold a peacekeeper training session in Washington.  We still need 9 more peacekeeper volunteers in order to hold this training. If you are able to volunteer as a peacekeeper, please contact peacekeepers@nowdc.org.

The first 2 weeks of NOW DC will focus on education, beginning on April 2nd with a full-day strategy conference called “Controlling the Corporations” at the Center for the Study of Responsive Law.  This conference is free and open to the public. Advance registration is requested. Following that will be the NOW DC Social Forum. The schedule of workshops and panels is available.  The social forum is also free. Please let us know if you will be there by sending a note to rsvp@nowdc.org.

NOW DC is organized by occupiers from all across the country. This is an all-volunteer effort and all events, including the OccuFest, are free and open to the public. We need your support in order for this to be a success. If you plan to participate in NOW DC, please volunteer by contacting volunteer@nowdc.org. If you cannot participate, please support if you are able by making a donation.

The racism that connects these murders

Winning justice for the murders of Trayvon Martin and Shaima Alawadi means challenging the racism at the heart of U.S. society, writes Khury Petersen-Smith.
Trayvon Martin and Shaima AlawadiTrayvon Martin and Shaima Alawadi
FOLLOWING THE news these days is like witnessing a parade of horrors. As soon as you regain your composure after being disturbed by an incident of racist violence, another comes into view.
Each day is bringing new details about the murder of Trayvon Martin, the Black teenager killed by racist vigilante George Zimmerman, whose body was drug-tested and classified as a "John Doe" by Sanford, Fla., police, as his parents desperately searched for their missing son. The same police department has allowed Zimmerman to go about his business without arrest.
On March 14, a few weeks after Trayvon's murder, police in Del City, Okla., killed Dane Scott Jr., an 18-year-old Black man, after pulling him over for a traffic stop. Scott--who the cops say was armed when they killed him, although no weapon has been produced--was shot in the back by police. He is among the latest African Americans killed by police this year, in a long list that includes Ramarley Graham in New York City, and Stephon Watts and Rekia Boyd in Chicago.
Then came the murder of Shaima Alawadi on March 21, one week after Dane Scott Jr. died.
The mother of five was viciously beaten into unconsciousness with a tire iron in her home in El Cajon, Calif. She died five days later after being removed from life support. According to Shaima's daughter, who discovered her mother's body, the killer left a note near Shaima, an Iraqi Muslim who wore a hijab, which read in part, "Go back to your country, you terrorist."
Yet police said in a statement, "Evidence thus far leads us to believe this is an isolated incident."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SPEAKING ABOUT the murder of Trayvon Martin, President Barack Obama said that we would all have to do some soul-searching to ask how such a killing could happen. But an honest look at racism in the U.S. reveals that these killings are neither isolated, nor complicated, nor surprising.
Trayvon, Shaima and others are the latest victims of a deeply bigoted society, and their killings are the bitter fruits of the most recent trends in institutional racism.
Racist violence has been a feature of U.S. society since the founding of the country. Both before and well after 1776, establishing the U.S. involved settling a land that already had inhabitants--the indigenous of America were subjected to a racist genocide. The enslaved Black population endured tremendous violence. And wave after wave of immigrants to the U.S. has been met by racist brutality.
In other words, racist violence in the U.S. is as old as the country itself.
One particular form that racism has taken recently is the criminalization of Blacks and Muslims.
The past 40 years has seen the mass incarceration of Black people on a level unheard-of in the U.S. or internationally. According to anti-racist legal scholar and author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness Michelle Alexander, there are more Black people currently incarcerated in the U.S. than there were Blacks in prisons in South Africa at the height of apartheid.
A central part of the effort to lock up so many Black people has been ideological. Through government policies, policing and the media, "Black" has become associated with "thug."
The same institutions are responsible, particularly since the September 11 terror attacks and the launching of the "war on terror," for making "Muslim" synonymous with "terrorist." Untold numbers of Muslims and Arabs have been detained, interrogated and deported since 2001.
The mainstream media and the political elite have been enthusiastic partners in whipping up a racist frenzy about the supposed Muslim terrorist threat. They are the ones who should take Obama's words about soul-searching to heart--the policymakers in the Obama administration (and Bush's, and every administration before that), and the media executives whose TV news channels nightly portray Blacks as criminals and whose newspapers promote fear of Arabs and Muslims and celebrate the invasions of their countries of origin.
Another contributing factor to the climate of racism today has been the behavior of the right wing during the 2008 election campaign and after.
As it became clear that their bid for the presidency was a losing one, the 2008 Republican ticket of John McCain and Sarah Palin increasingly invoked racism to attack Barack Obama and mobilize the hard-core right wing of the party.
McCain rallies became notorious as places where Nazis were welcome and calls for the murder of Obamawere tolerated. Meanwhile, right-wing media personalities like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity preached a doomsday scenario if a Black man actually became president. On the night Obama was elected, racists burned a Black church to the ground in Springfield, Mass.--one of many on a list of hate crimes that coincided with Obama's election.
Yet the Obama administration has been virtually silent about the rise of hate crimes and the climate of open racism tolerated in American politics. All of these things set the stage for the latest racist killings.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
IT'S IRONIC that African Americans on the one hand and Arabs and Muslims on the other are cast as the violent threats to an otherwise peaceful American society. It's obvious to anyone paying attention that these groups are subjected to violence.
Among the tragic aspects of Shaima's murder this month is the fact that she and her family emigrated here from Iraq, a country made barely habitable by two--count them, two--U.S. invasions in the last quarter century and an occupation that falls on the list of crimes against humanity in world history.
Together, these killings are revealing a nightmare of a society, with racist violence as a feature of daily life.
That racism must be rooted out. As disturbing as the news has been over the past few weeks, the antiracist solidarity that is growing in response to these crimes is very heartening. There have been rallies and marches across the country demanding justice for Trayvon Martin, and people everywhere are using social media to communicate about the killings and show solidarity with victims of racism.
There is nothing new about the police murder of unarmed Black people or hate crimes against Blacks, Arabs and Muslims. What is inspiring today is that many people are drawing a line with these recent incidents--and deciding that they will not go unchallenged.
Justice for Trayvon and Shaima will require far more than the arrest and prosecution of their killers. We have a whole set of racist institutions to take on and destroy. As anti-racists, we need to take these killings as a call to action and this moment as an opportunity to revive a tradition of relentlessly fighting oppression.
If racism is a central feature of U.S. history, struggle against it has been as well. We must rebuild, deepen and strengthen that struggle.
via:The Socialist Worker