3/3/11


Posted: 02 Mar 2011 05:49 PM PST
It seems that the efforts of the austerians to cow the public into cutting Social Security and Medicare are not getting traction. And Tea Party adherents are breaking with the Republican party line on this issue.
From the Wall Street Journal:
Less than a quarter of Americans support trimming Social Security or Medicare to tackle the country’s budget deficit, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll that illustrates the challenge facing lawmakers seeking voter support for altering entitlement programs.
The poll, conducted between Feb. 24 and 28, found strong opposition for cuts to these entitlement programs across all age groups and ideologies. Even tea party supporters, by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, declared cuts to Social Security “unacceptable.”….
The survey also found a sharp uptick in desire for the government to do more “to help meet the needs of people.” Just over half of people in the survey backed more government involvement, the highest percentage since February 2009, just after President Barack Obama’s inauguration.
Hhm….Obama is moving to the right as the country is moving to the left. But, as Tom Ferguson first described in his book Golden Rule and has since become blindingly obvious, powerful investors dominate party politics. Thus unless the trend towards a positive view of government promoting social aims progresses, it won’t affect the state of play in the Beltway.

 via:RobertAppleBaum.com

Your Ignorance Is Expected

When former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, a potential contender for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination, spoke at length during a radio interview the other day about President Obama's worldview having been shaped by his growing up in Kenya, the inevitable criticism about Huckabee's intentional spreading of a known lie was met with a predictable, tiresome and insulting response: he "misspoke."


Misspeaking is when you unintentionally say something that you do not mean to say. It's the act of invoking a poor choice of words when you mean to make a related point and, if nothing else, misspeaking is an accidental event.  By definition, one cannot misspeak on purpose.
Saying something you know to be false isn't misspeaking, it's lying.  Period.  You would think a former Baptist minister would know the difference - and he probably does - but somewhere along the way, spreading outright lies has been conflated with misspeaking so often that the shock value of a national figure knowingly spreading a hateful, bigoted, fear-mongering whopper of a lie has become virtually non-existent.  The public has been lied to so often, so consistently over the course of the last 30 years or so that such incidents are barely met with a shrug of the shoulders, much less the outrage that such instances deserve.  Politicians telling lies is considered par for the course and, regrettably, no big deal.
The problem is so much more pervasive today, however, with the advent of Fox "News" and the extensive reach of the ultra-regressive right wing media machine.  Regressive programming dominates AM talk radio, thanks to the Reagan Administration's dismantling of the fairness doctrine in 1987, and Fox "News" effectually operates as the communications arm of the RNC.  As a result, the problem is no longer limited to the occasional lie told by a politician; rather, such lies have a way of becoming accepted as truth when repeated often enough by partisan hacks posing as journalists.
Journalism in America used to perform a necessary and noble function as an additional check on the powers of those who hold higher office.  Whereas journalism used to be understood as a profession devoted to seeking out and reporting the truth, the lines between real journalism and partisan propaganda have been blurred to such a degree that the average consumer of news often has no idea that they're being lied to and manipulated to advance a political and ideological agenda, rather than being informed about local, national and international events.
Nowhere is this phenomenon put on such blatant display than at Fox "News."  While claiming to be "fair and balanced," Fox "News" exists for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of the Republican party, at the expense of the interests of the middle class.  Their embarrassingly vapid and moronic reporters and anchors are utterly incapable of independent thought, while their commentators are an endless parade of current and former high-ranking Republicans looking to cash in from their time in office.
One cannot claim to be "fair and balanced" when only one point of view is ever presented, however, that's really beside the point.  The truth doesn't have sides - either what is being reported consists of actual, verified facts or what is being reported is not news.  It cannot be both.  The implication behind the Fox "News" claim that their facts are "fair and balanced" is that other news outlets' facts are not.  Again, facts don't have different sides - something is either true or it is not - it doesn't get any simpler than that.
Nevertheless, for at least the last 15 years, the public's understanding of the role of Journalism in maintaining a healthy and honest democracy has eroded to the point where an entire generation has been instilled with the false notion that there's a liberal side and a conservative side to every story when nothing could be further from the truth.  Facts are neither liberal nor conservative - they're either true and, thus, verifiable, or they're not facts at all and, thus, lies.  It’s well past time we start acknowledging that reality.
On a near daily basis, the constant barrage of lies and distortions emanating from the Fox propaganda machine, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and countless other shameless peddlers of ignorance, bigotry and hate is exposed by sites like MediaMatters for America and shows like The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.  Politifact.com uses a graphic “truth-o-meter” to judge the accuracy of claims made by politicians – it’s downright appalling how often such claims are deemed “false” or, worse, attributed with the wholly unflattering “Pants on Fire” designation.  Michelle Bachmann, the batshit crazy Republican Representative from Minnesota has the dubious distinction of never having uttered a single statement deemed more than “half true,” yet she just won re-election in her home district by a landslide.
The real tragedy behind our collectively slipping insistence on truth is the so-called mainstream media’s wholesale abdication of their role as the arbiters of what is true and what is not.  Instead of playing the indispensible role of the “fourth estate,” the mainstream media is a corporate-dominated business enterprise with just as much of a vested interest in keeping the masses uninformed and ignorant as the politicians who tell their lies in the first place. 
As a result, only those of us who have the critical thinking skills necessary to recognize that truth is elusive and must be actively sought out through a variety of sources are truly informed about the world around us.  With the systemic dumbing-down of America occurring during the past few decades, fewer and fewer of us actually possess those skills and these disturbing trends are on a fixed trajectory to worsen over time. 
Not knowing that one is misinformed about any given topic is one of the most dangerous forms of ignorance.  Certainty that what you believe is actually true because a television or radio personality you like or trust decreed it to be so is one of the worst reasons for having such certainty.  Trust nobody but yourself to tell you the truth because only you have an interest in your own knowledge.  Everyone else is depending on your ignorance and doing everything in their power to make sure you stay that way.

Posted: 28 Feb 2011 11:55 AM PST
Washington’s Blog
In his acceptance speech for winner for best documentary at the Oscars, director Craig Ferguson said:
Three years after our horrific financial crisis caused by financial fraud, not a single financial executive has gone to jail, and that’s wrong.
But none of the mainstream, corporate networks covered it. Not CBS, ABC, NBC or MSNBC.
Ferguson told Reuters:
“The biggest surprise to me personally and biggest disappointment was that nobody in the Obama administration would speak with me even off the record — including people that I’ve known for many, many years,” Ferguson said backstage.
He believes Americans, who lost homes and jobs in the millions because of shady mortgage lending and bank collapses, are disappointed that “nothing has been done.”
“Unfortunately, I think that the reason is predominantly that the financial industry has become so politically powerful that it is able to inhibit the normal process of justice and law enforcement,” said Ferguson.
For background on the subversion of justice to the powers that be, see this.
Indeed, as I have repeatedly pointed out, fraud is one of the main causes of the financial crisis. See this and this.
Even Bernie Madoff tells New York Magazine:
“I realized from a very early stage that the market is a whole rigged job. There’s no chance that investors have in this market.”
***
“The SEC,” he says, “looks terrible in this thing.” And he doesn’t see himself as the only guilty party on Wall Street. “It’s unbelievable, Goldman … no one has any criminal convictions. The whole new regulatory reform is a joke. The whole government is a Ponzi scheme.”
The economy cannot stabilize unless fraud is prosecuted. But the folks in D.C. seem determined to turn a blind eye to Wall Street shenanigans, and is now moving to defund the enforcement agencies like the SEC and CFTC.
And yet the large corporate media never covers this issue. An October 2009 Pew Research Center study on the coverage of the financial crisis found that the media has largely parroted what the White House and Wall Street were saying. (The mainstream media is also pro-war.)
In fact, the financial industry has become so politically powerful that it is able to inhibit the normal process of justice and law enforcement, and the American press.
 
Posted: 28 Feb 2011 01:22 PM PST
By Lynn Parramore, Media Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. Cross posted from New Deal 2.0.
Busting unions gave Calvin Coolidge the White House, but it gave America the Great Depression.
For years, American workers’ wages have stagnated even as they produced more. Since 2008, they have been socked with staggering new bills for bank bailouts and hammered by a Great Recession brought on by the very same banks. Now public sector workers are confronted by a new crop of Republican governors who want to put an end to unions. Union workers in Wisconsin have already conceded all of Governor Walker’s draconian demands. But they want to hold on to their right to bargain so that they won’t be at the mercy of the whims of political appointees or rogue school boards. Tens of thousands have swarmed Madison to show their support for the working people of Wisconsin.
Conservatives are tasked with coming up with a narrative that makes villains out of these working folks and heroes out of the powerful people who aim to squeeze them for what’s left of their economic security.
This is not easy. And you have to admire their ingenuity. Amity Shlaes, ever the eager revisionist, has whipped up a widely parroted narrative that contains just enough truth to give it the ring of plausibility. It goes like this: Governor Scott Walker is a paragon of virtue who will soon be embraced by the American public, just like his union-crushing predecessors Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan. According to Shlaes’s account, Coolidge, then governor of Massachusetts, stood boldly against badly abused Boston policemen who walked off the job in 1919 and left the city unprotected against looters. After firing the policemen, Coolidge became a national hero and was promptly swept into the Vice President’s office on a wave of popular admiration. When President Warren Harding died, Coolidge took office and it was suddenly Morning in America. As Shlaes tells it:
“Boston Police’ remained American code for the principle that union causes do not trump others. The concern that the U.S. might succumb to European-style revolutions lifted. Strikes abated. Wages rose without unions in Motor City. Private-sector union membership declined. Joblessness dropped. Companies poured cash, which they otherwise would have spent on union relations, into innovation.
Let us fill in some finer detail, shall we?
As Shlaes admits, the Boston police force had been grossly abused with long hours and horrific conditions. And it was true that there was some disorder when they walked off the job, though she somewhat overstates the case. It is also true that Coolidge’s response made his reputation as a Republican politician.
But it was not exactly popular enthusiasm that wafted Coolidge into the White House. Actually, there was a huge orchestrated effort to push Coolidge by powerful financial interests. He ended up on the ticket with Warren Harding not so much because of his overwhelming appeal to the American public – he was known for being taciturn, unsociable, and downright weird (Alice Roosevelt Longworth wondered if he had been “weaned on a pickle”). Rather, it was his overwhelming appeal to American bankers.
They knew a good thing when they saw it.
Young Coolidge, you see, had gone to Amherst College, where he had hardly any friends except Dwight Morrow, who became his bosom buddy. Coolidge went on to become a small town Massachusetts attorney representing banks, while Morrow became a senior partner in House of Morgan. When Morrow saw his pal Coolidge attracting attention in the Boston Police Strike, he wrote to everyone he knew and launched a national campaign to make a legend out of the uncharismatic Coolidge. Morrow and fellow Morgan partner Thomas Cochran lobbied tirelessly for Coolidge at the Chicago Republican Convention in 1920, and their lobbying paid off. Coolidge, first as vice president and then as president in 1923 when Harding died, became a valuable partner for the House of Morgan. Famously declaring that “the business of America is business,” Coolidge stocked his administration with enough Morgan men to fill a banking convention. Historian Murray N. Rothbard notes that
the year 1924 indeed saw the House of Morgan at the pinnacle of political power in the United States. President Calvin Coolidge, friend and protégé of Morgan partner Dwight Morrow, was deeply admired by J.P. “Jack” Morgan, Jr. Jack Morgan saw the president, perhaps uniquely, as a rare blend of deep thinker and moralist. Morgan wrote a friend: ‘I have never seen any president who gives me just the feeling of confidence in the country and its institutions, and the working out of our problems, that Mr. Coolidge does.’
Coolidge got to the White House for crushing unions, where he slept ten hours a day and hopped on and off a mechanical horse in his underpants and a cowboy hat.
Here’s what America got: the Great Depression.
Coolidge’s real legacy was a huge upward shift of income during the “roaring twenties” away from ordinary people to the rich and powerful, who got even richer and more powerful thanks to his regulatory and policy inactivity. The best Average Joe could hope for under Coolidge was for his income to hold steady. The profits from that wondrous innovation and growth that send Shlaes into rhapsodies went to fatcats who turned the country into a casino and smashed the economy.
Reagan’s history is better known – or so you would think. His firing of 13,000 striking workers was, as Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson put it, “an unambiguous signal that employers need feel little or no obligation to their workers.” After Reagan, employers were emboldened to illegally ditch workers who sought to unionize, replace permanent employees who could collect benefits with temps, and ship factories and jobs abroad. Ever-smiling with his friendly cowboy image, Reagan tried to lower the minimum wage for younger workers, weaken child labor, job safety and anti-sweatshop laws, and do away with training programs for the jobless. He also did his best to replace thousands of federal employees with temps without civil service or union protections. Under his watch, the share of the nation’s wealth held by the richest 1 percent of Americans went up 5 percent richer. Guess whose declined?
At the time, Americans were supportive, by slim margins, of Reagan’s stance against the air traffic controllers, who went on strike to win benefit concessions from the federal government. However, the comparison with Wisconsin workers is not exactly apples to apples. These workers have agreed to concessions, and only fight to maintain their right to collective bargaining. Intuiting correctly that the public may not be on their side in this battle, conservatives have relentlessly pushed the deceptive idea that public employees enjoy higher salaries and better benefits than their private-sector counterparts. But this has been widely debunked. Careful research has shown that when you adjust for skill levels, public sector workers are not overpaid relative to private sector pay scales.
After the Great Crash, Coolidge’s bank-friendly, union-bashing policies didn’t seem like such a great gift to America. And just like in the twenties, Reagan’s signal that it was open season on unions energized a much bolder effort to hold down wages by corporate America: Over the next few years, workers by the thousands were let go, found their pay slashed, and turned into poorly paid part time employees. US income inequality reached Himalayan levels as people’s share of the benefits from increased productivity took a sharp nosedive. Today, after the Great Recession, Reagan’s anti-union attitude and enthusiasm for deregulation has also proven to be a dubious legacy.
Governor Walker says he’s fighting for ordinary Americans. So why does he want to require unions to re-certify every year, but we don’t hear a peep about corporations being required to renew their charters every year? Why does he want to control the salaries of public employees, but doesn’t have any interest in controlling the salaries of grossly overcompensated corporate CEOs? Why does he call for sacrifices from hard-working people who have been screwed by the economy through no fault of their own, and none from the financiers who caused the crisis?
Maybe it’s because he has quite a bit in common with Coolidge and Reagan after all. In Reagan’s case, as in Coolidge’s, union-busting led to some of the biggest peacetime income re-distributions in modern history. Democracy got weaker, oligopolies got stronger, the rich got richer, and the rest of us got left behind.
The real lesson from Coolidge and Reagan is this: If Governor Walker and his Republican friends are allowed to crush the public unions, you ain’t seen nothing yet

3/2/11



Washington, D.C.—Public Campaign Action Fund released background information today in response to Charles Koch’s Wall Street Journal op-ed bemoaning “crony capitalism” and “special favors."
“Charles Koch’s op-ed today should be in The Onion, not the Wall Street Journal,” said David Donnelly, national campaigns director for Public Campaign Action Fund. “Koch Industries is the perfect example of absolutely everything Charles claims to hate about our current political system. The hypocrisy is palpable.”
BACKGROUNDER
KOCH’S OP-ED: IS IT IRONY OR HYPOCRISY
In response to Koch Industries’ CEO Charles G. Koch’s opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today, campaign finance watchdog Public Campaign Action Fund compared some of Koch’s statements with reality.
Irony
Koch: “Too many businesses have successfully lobbied for special favors and treatment by seeking mandates for their products, subsidies (in the form of cash payments from the government), and regulations or tariffs to keep more efficient competitors at bay.”
Hypocrisy
  • Koch Industries, its executives, and its PAC donated $11,002,235 since 1989 to federal candidates, parties, and political committees.
  • The largest individual donors from all Koch-related donations were Charles and David Koch and their wives, who together contributed $2.8 million over the same time period. Of that, just $1,500 went to Democrats.
  • Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received $630,950 in Koch-related donations. House Appropriations members have received $656,115.
  • Koch Industries, its subsidiaries, and their PACs and employees donated $8,743,220 to state candidates, political parties, and committees since 2003.
  • Koch Industries has spent $49,520,500 lobbying the federal government in just the last five years, for an average of nearly $10 million per year. In 2008, they spent more than $20 million lobbying the federal government.
  • In January this year, Koch Industries hired seven lobbyists in Madison, Wisconsin.
Irony
Koch: “Crony capitalism is much easier than competing in an open market. But it erodes our overall standard of living and stifles entrepreneurs by rewarding the politically favored rather than those who provide what consumers want.”
Hypocrisy
  • Koch Industries, like other oil companies, benefits from the massive federal subsidies from the federal government. President Obama has proposed eliminating them, which will save taxpayers $43 billion over the next ten years.
  • Nowhere in his op-ed does Koch mention the subsidies.
  • Oil and gas interests like Koch donated $27,582,799 in the 2010 election cycle. The largest source was Koch-related donations at $1,911,212.
  • Seventy-one percent went to Republicans, who have almost exclusively opposed ending subsidies, with just 22 percent going to Democrats, who almost all supported ending the subsidies.
  • For Koch-related donations, 93 percent went to the GOP and six percent went to the Democrats.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Koch, along with his brother David, has played an outsized role in the political showdown in Wisconsin between Governor Scott Walker and state employees:
  • An organization the Koch brothers founded, Americans for Prosperity is running $342,200 worth of television adverting in the state.
  • Their political action committee was among the top donors to Walker’s campaign, giving $43,000.
  • Last week, a blogger impersonated David Koch and spoke with Walker for 20 minutes about strategy. The embarrassing prank unveiled the tremendous influence and access the Koch brothers have.
  • Koch Industries gave more than $1.2 million to the Republican Governors Association, which spent $5 million to elect Walker in 2010 according to the organization’s website.
Except where otherwise noted, campaign finance and lobbying data in this fact sheet can be found at the websites for Center for Responsive Politics for federal figures and the National Institute for Money in State Politics for state figures.

REPORT: How Koch Industries Makes Billions By Demanding Bailouts And Taxpayer Subsidies (Part 1)

Koch Industries, the international conglomerate owned by Charles and David Koch, is not only the second largest private company in America, it is the most politically active. As ThinkProgress has carefully documented over the last three years, Koch groups have spent tens of millions to influence government policy — from financing the Tea Parties, to funding junk academic studies, to undisclosed attack ads against Democrats, to groups promoting climate change denial, to a large network of state-based and national think tanks. In an opinion column for the Wall Street Journal today, Koch Industries CEO Charles Koch fired back at his critics, who have grown more vocal as it has become clear that Koch groups are providing the political muscle for Gov. Scott Walker’s (R-WI) union-busting power grab.
In his piece, Charles portrays himself as simply an ideological advocate, and says his money to political groups is only meant to “enhance true economic freedom.” He chides special interests that have “successfully lobbied for special favors,” claiming “crony capitalism is much easier than competing in an open market.” But in reality, the focus of the Koch political machine is geared towards “crony capitalism” — corrupting government to make Charles and his brother David Koch richer. Koch’s Tea Party libertarianism is actually a thin veneer for the company’s long running history of winning special deals from the government and manipulating the market to pad Koch profits:
– The dirty secret of Koch Industries is its birth under the centrally-planned Soviet Union. Fred Koch, the founder of the company and father of David and Charles, helped construct fifteen oil refineries for Joseph Stalin before expanding the business in the United States.
– As Yasha Levine has reported, Koch exploits a number of government programs for profit. For instance, Georgia Pacific, a timber company subsidiary of Koch Industries, uses taxpayer money provided by the U.S. Forestry Service to provide their loggers with taxpayer-funded roads and access to virgin growth forests. “Logging companies such as Georgia-Pacific strip lands bare, destroy vast acreages and pay only a small fee to the federal government in proportion to what they take from the public,” according to the Institute for Public Accuracy. Levine also notes that Koch’s cattle ranching company, Matador Cattle Company, uses a New Deal program to profit off federal land for free.
Koch Industries won massive government contracts using their close relationship with the Bush administration. The Bush administration, in a deal even conservatives alleged was a quid pro quo because of Koch’s campaign donations, handed Koch Industries a lucrative contract to supply the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve with 8 million barrels of crude oil. The SPR deal, done initially in 2002, was renewed in 2004 by Bush administration officials. During the occupation of Iraq, Koch won significant contracts to buy Iraqi crude oil.
– Although Koch campaigned vigorously against health reform — running attack ads, sponsoring anti-health reform Tea Parties, and comparing health reform to the Holocaust — Koch Industries applied for health reform subsidies made possible by the Obama administration.
– The Koch brothers have claimed that they oppose government intervention in the market, but Koch Industries lobbies aggressively for taxpayer handouts. In Alaska, blogger Andrew Halcro reported that a Koch subsidiary in Fairbanks asked Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration to use taxpayer money to bail out one of their failing refinery.
– SolveClimate recently reported that Koch Industries will reap huge profits from the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline, which runs from Koch-owned tar sands mining centers in Canada to Koch-owned refineries in Texas. To build the pipeline, politicians throughout the Midwest, many of whom have received large Koch campaign donations, have used eminent domain — government seizures of private land. In Kansas, where Koch-funded officials advise Gov. Sam Brownback (R-KS) and the Republican legislature, the Keystone XL Pipeline is likely to receive a property tax exemption of ten years, a special loophole that will cost Kansas taxpayers about $50 million.
– Koch Industries has been the recipient of about $85 million in federal government contracts mostly from the Department of Defense. Koch also benefits directly from billions in taxpayer subsidies for oil companies and ethanol production.
Charles has compared himself to a libertarian “Martin Luther,” evangelizing to the world for their supply side cause. However, the tens of millions in campaign donations and the dozens of front groups funded by Koch work in tandem to promoting the business interests of Koch Industries.
Koch funds both socially conservative groups and socially liberal groups. However, Koch’s financing of front groups and political organizations all have one thing in common: every single Koch group attacks workers’ rights, promotes deregulation, and argues for radical supply side economics. Not only do the Koch’s front groups pad Koch Industries’ bottom line, they supply the Koch brother’s talking points. In fact, for his opinion piece today, Charles heavily relied on front groups he finances for statistics. The “freedom index” cited by Charles is a creation of the Koch-funded Heritage Foundation, and the erroneous “unfunded liabilities” claim was supplied by the Koch-funded National Center for Policy Analysis.

3/1/11

Angry Buckeyes


ANGRY BUCKEYES!!!! Cutting Ohio King Kasich!

House GOP Says ‘So Be It’ To Taxpayers, Votes Unanimously to Protect Big Oil Subsidies

House Republicans voted in lockstep this afternoon to protect corporate welfare for Big Oil, even as they call for draconian cuts to programs that everyday Americans depend on each day.  As the House of Representatives moved toward approving a stopgap resolution to avert a government shutdown for another two weeks, Democrats offered a motion to recommit that would have stripped the five largest oil companies of taxpayer subsidies, saving tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer funds.  The motion failed on a vote of 176-249, with all Republicans voting against (approximately a dozen Democrats joined the GOP). A similar vote two weeks ago to recoup $53 billion in taxpayer funds from Big Oil was also voted down, largely along party lines. The former CEO of Shell Oil, John Hoffmeister, recently said Big Oil doesn’t need subsidies “in face of sustained high oil prices.”  From 2005 to 2009, the largest oil companies have made a combined $485 billion in profits.
Support the Wisconsin 14
Clicking here will add your name to this note to Wisconsin's Democratic state senators:
Take action now!

Amazing. Inspiring. This is what people power can do.
When Republican Governor Scott Walker attacked state workers and threatened to call out the National Guard if they protested, it sparked a popular uprising in Wisconsin. And now the extreme proposal to take collective bargaining rights away from public employees is temporarily blocked as a result of mass protests.
Tens of thousands of people — including members of CREDO Action — have been out in the streets and in the Rotunda in Madison, Wisconsin. Students and citizens are protesting in solidarity with nurses, teachers and workers.
And the people are not alone. Instead of caving to the opposition, their elected representatives are fighting with them. In fact, Democratic state senators boldly left the state in order to deny Republicans the quorum they need to pass Governor Walker's radical anti-worker, anti-union bill. As long as every Democratic state senator refuses to go to the capitol, a vote cannot be held.
Wisconsin state Senator Chris Larson, who is one of the senators in hiding, laid out the stakes in an open letter and asked for our support:
The ability to organize and get fair treatment are qualities that built our country... If this bill moves forward in Wisconsin, rights in all America we have grown to take for granted will no longer be so reliable... If this passes here, it will pass in your state... It is an unprecedented attack on workers, their communities and our tradition of working with labor to move our state forward... I am seeking your support for the fight ahead of us.
Larson, and his fellow Democratic senators, are literally working to evade capture by state police in order to prevent this radical attack on public workers. He's asked for our support.
Too often our elected representatives refuse to lead. But Wisconsin is proving that big things can happen when our elected officials work together with committed activists and fight back.
All 14 Democratic state senators are holed up outside the reach of the State Troopers who are working on orders of the Governor to forcibly return them to the capitol. If even one Democratic state senator is returned to the capitol, Republicans will be able to pass Gov. Walker's bill. Not only that, but Republicans are organizing recall efforts to throw them out of office. The Wisconsin 14 need to hear encouragement from progressives nationwide. Let's show them resounding support for their actions.
Our teachers, nurses and other public workers wouldn't have the chance to fight for their rights without the bravery of these Wisconsin state senators. I'm proud to have grown up in Wisconsin. I received an excellent education from its public schools and was raised in a working-class community that valued the contributions of every citizen. Wisconsin would not be the great state it is without the work of thousands of people who have dedicated their lives to public service.
Media Reform Daily
News of the movement
Public Broadcasting, a 'Luxury' We Can't Do Without Like millions of my countrymen, I am profoundly concerned that the debate over government spending, while necessary, has come to threaten the cultural, educational, informational and civilizing influences that help equip us for enlightened citizenship. Suddenly, these are dismissed as "unaffordable luxuries" when in fact we have never needed them more. Difficult decisions will have to be made -- but not on the back of an infinitesimally small fraction of the deficit that the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities and public broadcasting represent.
Ken Burns, Washington Post
PBS Faces New Threat in Federal Budget With the new Congress, Republicans again have made public broadcasting a target for cuts, and the petitions and on-air appeals are back. This time, however, even a recent Capitol appearance by Arthur, the booking-loving aardvark, may not be enough to fully stave off a reduction in financing.
Elizabeth Jensen, New York Times
Rep. McCollum: Republicans Wrong to Go After Public Broadcasting Despite the unanimous opposition of Democrats, the U.S. House passed an appropriations bill that eliminates all funding for CPB and ends federal support for public media. If allowed to stand, this attack on unbiased reporting and quality cultural and educational programming on television and radio and online will have dire consequences here at home for Minnesota Public Radio and Twin Cities Public Television, not to mention the Minnesotans who rely on public broadcasting every day.
Betty McCollum, Minneapolis Star Tribune
Public Broadcasters in Northeast Ohio Say Loss of Federal Funding Would Be Devastating These are nervous times at the area's public broadcasting stations. The budget bill passed this month by the House would cut $61 billion in federal spending, including the $430 million allocated to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. About 70 percent of that CPB money is channeled to the nation's public radio and television stations. And Northeast Ohio's public broadcasters say the loss of that funding would have a devastating effect.
Mark Dawidziak, Plain Dealer
Don't Cut Funding for Public Broadcasting In a budget proposal, House Republicans announced plans to zero out all funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the nonprofit responsible for funding public media including PBS and NPR. Public media is one of the last bulwarks against the corporate media, where the combination of consolidation and profit motive has long since shifted the focus to infotainment rather than substantive news.
John Pryor, Bloomington Pantagraph
Community Media Outlets Under Attack More than 3,000 Public, Educational and Government access channels across the nation provide a vital platform for community-produced video from full coverage of local town halls, to student-produced shows about topics that matter to their campus, to city council meetings and debates. The programming on these stations is critical in creating an engaged, informed and active community. Unfortunately, PEG stations are under attack in states across the nation.
Beth McConnell, Progressive States Network
Boehner's Attack on Net Neutrality Not Based in Reality In a speech to religious broadcasters, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) warned that "the FCC is creeping further into the free market by trying to regulate the Internet." But there is no government takeover, there's no censorship, and there's no gatekeeper when there's Net Neutrality -- that's the whole point. The government doesn't decide what's available, and neither does your Internet service provider.
Free Press
FCC Announces New Broadcast Ownership Database Revealing Ownership Neglect The FCC has announced its new broadcast ownership database in a format that can be searched and manipulated for media and public policy research. However, for broadcast stations, the new database reveals that many broadcasters have never filed timely reports about their ownership.
Michael Grotticelli, BroadcastEngineering
Lobbying Intensifies As Cable Firms Aim to End Retransmission Battles Lobbying has picked up in recent weeks as the FCC prepares to launch a proposed rulemaking on possible changes to the current rules governing the process by which cable operators and other video content distributors negotiate to retransmit broadcasters' programming.
Juliana Gruenwald, National Journal
Did Google Pre-Emptively Block a 4G iPhone on Verizon? In 2008, after much protest, Verizon accepted openness conditions attached to valuable spectrum being auctioned off by the FCC, and spent $4.7 billion to buy nationwide capacity that would ensure it could build a robust 4G network for the next generation of mobile devices. But in doing so, Verizon may have screwed itself out of ever being able to offer a 4G-capable iPhone.
Ryan Singel, Wired
No Support for U.S. Proposal for Domain Name Veto The Obama administration has failed in its bid to allow it and other governments to veto future top-level domain names, a proposal that raised questions about balancing national sovereignty with the venerable Internet tradition of free expression.
Declan McCullagh, CNet
When the Internet Nearly Fractured and How It Could Happen Again When the entire country of Egypt was forced offline by its government last month, it served as a global wake-up call that the Internet is a more fragile medium than we imagine it to be. What happened in Egypt was particularly striking, but other, more subtle tests of the Internet's resilience abound.
Nancy Scola, The Atlantic
Are Amazon.com's Days of Tax Free Selling Numbered? Amazon has successfully fended off pesky state tax collectors for 16 glorious years. But the battle has entered a new stage as Amazon builds warehouse/fulfillment centers in more locations, states grow hungrier for revenue, and a rising sales tax rate puts retailers who do collect tax at an ever bigger disadvantage.
Janet Novack, Forbes
he National Conference for Media Reform 2011 promises to be the biggest event in the country that tackles what is arguably the biggest issue in the country: the state of our media. Book your ticket to Boston. Then start planning your own journey through our three-day event. Register now!
In Other News...
At Comcast, No Fear of Web Video Comcast Corp.'s chokehold on its subscribers' video consumption is slipping away as new video providers muscle in on the business. But Brian Roberts, Comcast's chief executive, says he's still optimistic about the future of the country's largest cable operator, which isn't just a cable concern any more.
Wall Street Journal
Sudden Death for Cable? YouTube Talking About Streaming Live Sports Google's YouTube unit is talking with professional sports leagues about streaming their games live. If it happens, it could have a major impact on cable which has been using live sporting events as a differentiator with over-the-top competitors like Google, Apple and Netflix.
FierceCable
Consumer Reports Revives iPhone Antenna Gripe It looks like deja vu when it comes to reception issues on the iPhone 4 tied to its external antenna. Consumer Reports said it found the same problem with weak reception on Verizon Wireless' new version of the phone that it did when AT&T released the iPhone 4 in July.
MediaPost
How Social Media Is Pushing the Limits of Legal Ethics That some people simply cannot keep their social media usage to an acceptable level is no secret. Only unlike a student spending the entirety of Biology 101 updating her Facebook page or an NBA player tweeting from the locker room, this type of behavior can have real consequences when the user in question is sitting in a courtroom.
GigaOM
Qaddafi YouTube Spoof by Israeli Gets Arab Fans A YouTube clip mocking Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi's megalomania is fast becoming a popular token of the Libya uprising across the Middle East. And in an added affront to Colonel Qaddafi, it was created by an Israeli living in Tel Aviv.
New York Times
Thailand to Further Probe Killing of Reuters Journalist Thai investigators said they were still trying to establish who killed Reuters cameraman Hiro Muramoto last year after reversing preliminary findings that a soldier probably fired the fatal bullet.
Reuters
A Limit on Lending E-Books Until now, libraries that have paid for the privilege of making a publisher’s e-books available for borrowing have typically been granted the right to lend an e-book -- say, the latest John Grisham thriller -- an unlimited number of times. HarperCollins said that it had changed its mind. Beginning March 7, its books may be checked out only 26 times before the license expires.
New York Times
Small Towns Mourn Fast-Closing Post Offices Post offices have withered along with the rest of small-town Iowa, with an average of about six offices in the state closed annually in recent years. But the waves of closures on tap in 2011 -- likely to number in the dozens out of the state's 850 or so offices -- will be on an unprecedented scale.
Des Moines Register
Oprah's New Channel Struggles to Pull in the Viewers Oprah Winfrey is finding out just how hard it is to build an out-of-the-way channel into a television destination. OWN, her two-month-old channel, is attracting fewer viewers than the obscure channel it replaced, Discovery Health.
New York Times
Upcoming Events
FCC March Open Meeting
Mar 3: Washington, DC
Net Neutrality: Who Owns the Internet?
Mar 8: New Brunswick, NJ
NTEN 2011 Lobby Day and Annual Conference
Mar 17-Mar 19: Washington, DC
The National Conference for Media Reform 2011