5/28/11



Taking the Side of the Billionaires

America’s Right – from the NFL lockout to Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget – side with the billionaires in what amounts to an escalating class war against the middle class and the poor

If American football fans end up facing a fall without NFL games, they probably won’t blame George W. Bush and other Republican presidents for packing the federal courts with right-wing judges, but it was two Bush appointees who reversed a District Court ruling that would have ended the lockout of players.
The Appeals Court judgment encouraged the NFL’s hardline billionaire owners to resist making the kinds of compromises that a few less intransigent owners recognize could easily resolve the impasse.
Now, the hardliners simply assume that Republican judges will keep siding with the NFL owners and thus enable them to beat down the players, eventually assuring the billionaire owners a bigger piece of the revenue pie – even if that means losing some or all of the 2011 season.
What many average Americans, especially white guys, don’t seem to understand is that whatever the populist-styled rhetoric of Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, the Right’s default position is to side with the billionaires – and to show little or no regard for the fate of anyone else, whether NFL players or sick senior citizens.
Still, one must give the Right credit for having worked hard refining how to phrase its arguments. Right-wingers even have turned the term “class warfare” against the Left by shouting the phrase in a mocking fashion whenever anyone tries to blunt the “class warfare” that the billionaires have been waging against the middle class and the poor for decades.
On right-wing TV and talk radio across the country, there are tag teams of macho men pretending that ”class warfare” exists only in the fevered imagination of the Left. But billionaire investor Warren Buffett has acknowledged the truth: “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”
The right-wing propagandists further earn their keep by disparaging science as “elitist.” So, even as the dire predictions from climate-change experts that global warming will generate more extreme weather seem to be coming true, many Americans who have listened to the “climate-change-deniers” for years still reject the scientific warnings.
While no single weather event can be connected to the broader trend of climate change, the warnings about what might happen when the earth’s atmosphere heats up and absorbs more moisture seem to be applicable to the historic flooding in some parts of the world, droughts in others, and the outbreak of particularly violent storms.
Heat and moisture are especially dangerous ingredients for hurricanes and tornados.
Ironically, the parts of the United States hardest hit by this severe weather are those represented predominately by Republicans who have been at the forefront of obstructing government efforts to address the global-warming crisis.
Flooding, hurricanes and tornados have inflicted horrendous damage on Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Texas, Tennessee, Missouri and Oklahoma – all part of the Republican base.
God’s Punishment?
If televangelist Pat Robertson were a left-winger instead of a right-winger, he might be saying that God is punishing these “red states” for doubting the science of global warming.
However, even as the U.S. news obsesses over the violent weather, mainstream media stars have steered clear of whether global warming might be a factor. It’s as if they know that they’d only be inviting career-damaging attacks from the Right if they did anything to connect the dots.
The Right also is not eager to explain how these catastrophes will require emergency funding and rebuilding assistance from the federal government. After all, you don’t want Republican voters to understand that sometimes “self-reliance” alone doesn’t cut it; sometimes, we all need help and the government must be part of that assistance.
In the case of the killer tornado that devastated Joplin, Missouri, House Republicans, without a hint of irony, are extracting the funds for disaster relief from green energy programs, which remain a favorite GOP target since many Republicans still insist there is no such thing as global warming.
At both state and national levels, Republican leaders have lined up behind climate-change deniers, with former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty just the latest GOP presidential hopeful to apologize for his past support of a cap-and-trade system aimed at reducing global-warming gases.
Any serious move toward alternative energies would, of course, be costly to the giant oil companies and their billionaire owners, like David Koch of Koch Industries who has spent millions of dollars funding right-wing organizations, such as the Tea Party. The Right’s media/political operatives know better than to bite the hand that feeds them.
GOP orthodoxy also disdains tax increases on the rich or even elimination of tax breaks for the oil industry. The Republican insistence on low tax rates for the wealthy, in turn, has forced consideration of other policy proposals to achieve savings from services for average Americans.
That is why congressional Republicans have targeted Medicare with a plan that would end the current health program for the elderly and replace it with a scheme that would give subsidies to senior citizens who would then have to sign up for health insurance from private industry, which has proven itself far less efficient in providing health care than the government.
The GOP budget, drafted by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, would impose the Medicare changes on seniors beginning in 10 years.
Most attention on the Ryan plan has focused on estimates that it would cost the average senior citizen more than $6,000 extra per year, but the proposal also has the effect of privatizing Medicare, meaning that the government would make direct “premium support” payments to profit-making insurance companies whose interest is in maximizing profits, not providing the best possible care for old people.
While the Ryan plan would achieve budget “savings” by shifting the burden of health-care costs onto the elderly, Ryan’s budget also would lower tax rates for the wealthiest Americans even more, from 35 percent to 25 percent. Partly because of that tax cut, Ryan’s budget would still not be balanced for almost three decades.
Class Warfare
Thus, the battle lines of America’s “class warfare” are getting more sharply drawn. The conflict is now over the Right’s determination to concentrate even more money and power in the hands of the rich by hobbling any government capability to protect the people’s general welfare.
If the Right wins, individual Americans will be left essentially defenseless in the face of unbridled corporate power.
Ryan’s Medicare plan may be just the most striking example because it envisions sick old people trying to pick their way through a thicket of private insurance plans with all their confusing language designed to create excuses for denying coverage. It is not an exaggeration to say that Ryan’s tight-fisted Medicare plan could consign millions of Americans to a premature death.
The Right’s priorities hit home at a town hall meeting held by Rep. Rob Woodall, R-Georgia, when he chastised one of his constituents who worried that Ryan’s plan would leave Americans like her, whose employer doesn’t extend health benefits to retirees, out of luck.
“Hear yourself, ma’am. Hear yourself,” Woodall lectured the woman. “You want the government to take care of you, because your employer decided not to take care of you. My question is, ‘When do I decide I’m going to take care of me?’”
However, another constituent noted that Woodall accepted government-paid-for health insurance for himself.
“You are not obligated to take that if you don’t want to,” the woman said. “Why aren’t you going out on the free market in the state where you’re a resident and buy your own health care? Be an example. …
“Go and get it in a single-subscriber plan, like you want everybody else to have, because you want to end employer-sponsored health plans and government-sponsored health plans. … Decline the government health plan and go to Blue Cross/Blue Shield or whoever, and get one for yourself and see how tough it is.”
Woodall answered that he was taking his government health insurance “because it’s free. It’s because it’s free.”
Self-reliance, it seems, is easier to preach to others than to practice yourself.
Woodall’s explanation recalled the hypocrisy of free-market heroine Ayn Rand, whom Rep. Ryan has cited as his political inspiration. In her influential writings, Rand ranted against social programs that enabled the “parasites” among the middle-class and the poor to sap the strength from the admirable rich, but she secretly accepted the benefits of Medicare after she was diagnosed with lung cancer.
A two-pack-a-day smoker, Rand had denied the medical science about the dangers of cigarettes, much as her acolytes today reject the science of global warming. However, when she developed lung cancer, she connived to have Evva Pryor, an employee of Rand’s law firm, arrange Social Security and Medicare benefits for Ann O’Connor, Ayn Rand using her husband’s last name.
In 100 Voices: An Oral History of Ayn Rand, Scott McConnell, founder of the Ayn Rand Institute’s media department, quoted Pryor as saying: “Doctors cost a lot more money than books earn and she could be totally wiped out.”
So, when push came to shove, even Ayn Rand wasn’t above getting help from the “despised government.” However, her followers, including Rep. Ryan, now want to strip those guaranteed benefits from other Americans of more modest means than Ayn Rand.
It seems it’s okay for average Americans to be wiped out.
Hypocrisy, Hypocrisy
While the Right’s penchant for hypocrisy is well-known (note how many Republicans involved in the impeachment of President Bill Clinton had their own extra-marital affairs), the bigger mystery is why so many average-guy Americans volunteer to fight for the rich in the trenches of the Right’s class warfare.
Clearly, the Right’s propaganda with its endless repetition is very effective, especially given the failure of the American Left to invest significantly in a competing message machine. The Right also has adopted the tone of populism, albeit in support of a well-to-do economic elite.
Yet, perhaps most importantly, the Right has stuck with its battle plan for rallying a significant percentage of middle-class Americans against their own interests.
Four decades ago, President Richard Nixon and his subordinates won elections by demonizing “hippies,” “welfare queens” and the “liberal media.”
Then, in the late 1970s, a tripartite coalition took shape consisting of the Republican Establishment, neoconservatives and the leaders of the Christian Right. Each group had its priorities.
The rich Republicans wanted deep tax cuts and less business regulation; the neocons wanted big increases in military spending and a freer hand to wage wars; and the Christian Right agreed to supply political foot soldiers in exchange for concessions on social issues, such as abortion and gay rights. Ultimately, each part of the coalition got a chunk of what it wanted.
From Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush, the rich got their taxes slashed, saw regulations rolled back and gained a larger share of the nation’s wealth and political power. The neocons got massive military spending and the chance to dispatch U.S. soldiers to kill Israel’s Muslim enemies. The Christian Right got help in restricting abortions and punishing gays.
But what did the American middle-class get?
Over those three decades, the middle-class has stagnated or slipped backward. Labor unions were busted; jobs were shipped overseas; personal debt soared; education grew more expensive, along with medical care. People were working harder and longer – for less. Or they couldn’t find jobs at all.
With today’s Tea Party and the Ryan budget, the Right’s coalition is staying on the offensive. If the House budget were passed in total, tax rates for the rich would be reduced another 10 percentage points; military spending would remain high to please the neocons (who foresee a possible war with Iran); and Planned Parenthood and other pet targets of the Christian Right would be zeroed out.
Yet, with the proposed elimination of traditional Medicare, the Ryan budget has lifted the curtain on what the Right’s “free market” has in mind for most average Americans, who could expect to find their lives not only more brutish but shorter.
The real-life-and-death consequences of the Right’s tax cuts, military spending and culture wars are finally coming into focus. If you’re not rich – and can’t afford to pick up the higher tab on health care – you’re likely to die younger. Or your kids might have to dig into their pockets to help you out.
Less extreme but still troubling, another consequence of the Right’s remarkable success over the past three decades might become apparent on your TV screens this fall.
Thanks to all those right-wing judges packed onto federal appeals courts by Reagan and the two Bushes, American football fans might not have the NFL to watch.
The NFL’s lockout of its players seemed to be ending several weeks ago when a lower-court judge ruled against the billionaire owners, but the NFL’s lawyers confidently filed an appeal to a three-judge panel on the Eighth Circuit, knowing that they would surely get one dominated by Republican judges.
They did. Steven Colloton and Duane Benton, two Republicans appointed by George W. Bush, constituted the majority on the panel and reflexively sided with the NFL’s owners.
The ruling should have surprised no one. After all, the Right’s default position is almost always to side with the billionaires.
Robert Parry
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, was written with two of his sons, Sam and Nat. His two previous books are Secrecy & Privilege: The Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq and Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth'.



Facing South is your weekly source for in-depth coverage and fresh perspectives on the South, published by the Institute for Southern Studies.
INSTITUTE INDEX - Congress's stock market advantage

Basis points per month by which a portfolio imitating the common stock purchases of U.S. Representatives outperforms the market: 55

Percentage return per year this represents: over 6

Annual percentage by which Republican lawmakers beat the market: 2

By which Democratic lawmakers beat the market: 9

Number of stock transactions the study examined: 16,000

Approximate number of House members who made those transactions: 300

Time period the study considered: 1985-2001

Basis points per month by which a portfolio that mimics the investment of U.S. Senators outperforms the market, according to similar 2004 research: 85

Percent return per year this represents: approximately 10

Number of stock trades that an aide to former Republican House leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) made from his Capitol Hill computer in 1999 and 2000, profiting handsomely: nearly 500

Year in which the Securities and Exchange Commission looked into whether the office of former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) shared inside information with investors after stock prices of companies with asbestos liabilities rose right before Frist proposed a public trust fund for asbestos claims: 2005

Number of House rules that require members to divest themselves of common stocks, prevent them from trading freely while in office, or require recusals from votes that could affect their investments: 0

Year in which the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act was first introduced to prohibit members of Congress and their staff from using knowledge gained on the job to trade stocks: 2006

Date when the STOCK Act was most recently introduced: 3/2011

Number of sponsors and co-sponsors the legislation has: 5

Number of those sponsors and co-sponsors who are from Southern states: 0

(Click on figure to go to source.)
art by Gregory M. Figg

Posted: 23 May 2011 12:57 PM PDT
By Matt Stoller, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. His Twitter feed is:
http://www.twitter.com/matthewstoller.

The youth in Spain are very very angry, with unemployment at Depression-levels of roughly 21%, and they are rocking the nation with protests. What is less clear is how this plays out. The echoes of Wisconsin are obvious.
Protesters have set up an infirmary, a computer tent and a “guerrilla garden” of vegetables with the help of donations from supporters. The tents and tarps were still in place on Monday morning. But the crowd was smaller and analysts said the momentum of the movement will be hard to maintain.
“The big problem is that (the movement) has no path into formal politics. There is no party legitimately speaking on their behalf… no Green party as in other European countries which would back them,” said David Bach, Professor of Strategy and Economic Environment at IE Business School in Madrid.
The elite consensus is basically the same in both countries. There are differences, I suppose; in Spain, protesters eat vegetables, while in American, protesters eat pizza.
Domestic actors representing popular interests are in a bind. American labor officials are frustrated but impotent, with a few officials claiming that they will no longer give money to Democrats. I find this hard to believe; in the latest nationally consequential special Congressional election, labor mostly backed neoliberal Democrat Janice Hahn. For whatever reason, organized leaders running large amounts of capital and/or official in charge of representing labor simply cannot break away from the elite consensus. We saw this during the bipartisan consensus in favor of TARP, and in fact now, every single Democratic successor to Nancy Pelosi as Speaker voted for TARP.
The embers of breakdown are everywhere. In China, the company that makes iPads and iPhones has installed suicide nets to keep its employees from killing themselves in an especially embarrassing manner. But you can’t really force exploding buildings to do what you want, if what you want is more iPads to sell.
This increasing rigidity of the global economic order is frightening, and dangerous. It is the consequence of the new normal, Spanish and Wisconsin-colored flames licking up at the system be damned. One day, these protests won’t be leaderless, rudderless, and directionless. Perhaps the popular energy on that date will be channeled through an electoral system, perhaps not. Perhaps figures like New York AG Eric Schneiderman represent a new generation of leaders bent on restructuring our cultural obligations into a social contract that is stable and somewhat just.
One day a chunk of the elites will break away from this consensus, as the system experiences a breakdown that is so severe it threatens the interests of a powerful constituency group. For now, we will be watching the embers.
Foreclosure-gate 6.0    AG's Jump Ship as Expected...
 
Posted: 23 May 2011 12:29 PM PDT
In further proof that attorneys general are abandoning the 50 state attorneys general investigation, California AG Kamala Harris announced that she is establishing a 25 person mortgage fraud task to look into abuses across the spectrum, from the individual borrower level to practices, such as questionable transfers to trusts when the securitizations were formed, that hurt investors.
Note that the defection of a second Democrat (Harris follows New York’s AG Eric Schneiderman in creating her own effort) from the AG investigation is particularly significant. A number of Republicans joined at the 11th hour and were never on board with the premise of talks, so their defection is expected. By contrast, the AGs from solidly Democratic states were expected to stay the course. The fact that the AGs from two major states have effectively left the talks confirm what we have said all along: that the negotiations were not serious precisely because no investigations had been conducted.
We applaud this step forward by Harris, since it shows at least some public servants are taking mortgage abuses seriously. From the Los Angeles Times (hat tip reader Denotis):
The team of 17 lawyers and eight special agents from the state Department of Justice will pursue three major areas, Harris said in an interview:
•Corporate fraud, including instances in which bundled mortgages were sold as securities to the state or its pension funds under false pretenses. Harris said her office plans to prosecute some cases under California’s False Claims Act, which she described as “one of those very powerful tools that California uniquely has … to pursue, in essence, what are false claims that are submitted to the state.”
•Scams, including instances in which consultants, lawyers and others took fees from people in foreclosure, saying they would help the homeowners get loan modifications or other remedies, but delivered nothing.
•Fraudulent lending practices, including deceptive marketing, failure to fully disclose loan terms and qualifying people for loans who couldn’t afford the terms…
“We are looking at a situation of up to $640 billion in wealth having been lost because of this wave of foreclosures that has hit the state,” Harris said, referring to the decline in homeowner equity. “There is a direct connection” between mortgage fraud “and the issue that we are challenged with in terms of our state budget crisis.”…
Harris said her initiative was distinct from the multistate investigation because it would go after all aspects of the mortgage-lending business…
Harris said that although successful prosecutions of major players in the mortgage meltdown have been difficult, the severity of the crisis called for a tough-minded approach to mortgage fraud, one that could target executives of major financial institutions.
“If the evidence leads us there, no case will be too big or too small to pursue,” Harris said. “There remain millions of people affected by the mortgage crisis.”…
“The burden of proof in a criminal case is very high,” Los Angeles defense attorney Jan Handzlik said. “It would be necessary for the AG to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the mortgage executives had knowledge of the fraud and acted with a criminal intent.”….
William K. Black, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor and an aggressive regulator of the savings and loan industry after its crisis in the 1980s, said the state prosecutors could be successful if they carefully chose their targets.
Black asserted that the federal government has the means to pursue these cases but hasn’t shown the will.
“The success rate in the savings and loan cases, despite the fact that they were more complex … was 90%, and this was against the best criminal defense attorneys in America,” Black said.


via Naked Capitalism/Yves Smith
Posted: 26 May 2011 10:42 PM PDT
Progressive groups launched an online petition calling for the Administration to make a recess appointment of Elizabeth Warren to head the CFPB. Not surprisingly, it gained traction quickly, and now has 158,000 signatures (the initial goal, as reported by Housing Wire, was 175,000; it was apparently increased based on the sign up rate).
This weekend is theoretically a window for a recess appointment (note that the lengthy Senate confirmation process makes it impossible for anyone to be in place by the Dodd Frank start date of July 21, so a recess appointment looks to be inevitable). But there’s no reason to use this opportunity given a Senate July 4-10 break.
I urge readers to sign the petition while maintaining my view that Warren will not get the nod. The Administration has been casting about for Anybody But Warren to take the job, with the amusing result than many of the candidates saying that Warren should get the job. Warren’s stubborn refusal to take the Republican’s aggressive moves and the Administration’s obvious antipathy seriously is creating marvelous political theater. We’ve now had the spectacle of Geithner, whose bank-coddling stance makes him an ideological opponent of the Harvard professor, being forced to support her in public in the face of ham-handed attacks by Republican Senators this week.
So far, the Administration has been able to neuter critics on the left by getting nominally liberal organizations defunded if they don’t toe the party line. They started with smaller groups early on to demonstrate the costs of defiance and I have been told of much large, more established groups coming into the Administration’s crosshairs as part of its pre-2012 brush-clearing. Warren, who has profile and standing independent of any progressive institutional infrastructure, is outside their normal mechanism of disciplining the uncooperative. And she refuses to do a Brooksley Born and quietly slink away under fire.
Now admittedly Warren has not crossed swords with the powers that be in as direct a manner as Born. She’s kept her head down and played a cautious bureaucratic game, despite her frontal manner in hearings. And if I am proven wrong and she does get the nod, it will be because she has convinced the Administration that she will behave. She may believe that half a loaf is better than none, and that CFPB measures to improve disclosures and make it easier for consumers to comparison shop and file complaints will be hard for the banks to block and will do more to protect consumers than Team Obama might think. So I’m more comfortable with Warren losing the appointment but discomfiting the Administration than with her making whatever pact with the devil she’d have to enter into to win the CFPB job.
Update 2:00 AM: Reader propertius points out that the Senate has scheduled “pro forma” sessions to keep the Senate officially in session and block a recess appointment over the one-week holiday. As we noted, we didn’t expect Obama to try to appoint Warren this weekend, and this maneuver does provide Obama with a convenient out. The question is whether anyone on the left will be imaginative enough to make the Republicans look as craven as they are in pretending to be open for business to derail a single tough-minded woman. Details from The Hill:
GOP opposition is preventing the Senate from completely adjourning for the Memorial Day recess. Instead, the chamber will come in for three pro-forma sessions over the next ten days.
The cursory sessions are a formality that will ensure President Obama does not make recess appointments, a prospect that was considered unlikely anyway because the recess is scheduled for only a week….
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) applauded the GOP action to ensure recess appointments would not take place.
“President Obama has been packing federal agencies with left-wing ideologues, but thankfully he won’t be able to for at least the next week. The House will not be sending an adjournment resolution to the Senate, we will remain in pro forma session, and no controversial nominees will be allowed to circumvent the confirmation process during the break,” DeMint said.

5/26/11

Patriot Act Passes Senate Here's the list of who Voted to take Away your Civil Liberties Never Forget!

PoliticalAmazon
  • +2
    PoliticalAmazon  
  • HOUSE VOTES FROM YESTERDAY VOTING "AYE"

    These are the real motherfuckers...the ones who voted to extend, without reform, the parts of the Patriot Act which are the ones our government uses the most to terrorize us.

    -----------------

    Representatives voting AYE to more spying without reform

    Gary Ackerman – Aderholt – John Adler – Todd Akin – Rodney Alexander – Jason Altmire – Rob Andrews – Mike Arcuri – Steve Austria – Joe Baca – Michele Bachmann – Spencer Bachus – Brian Baird – John Barrow – Joe Barton – Melissa Bean – Shelly Berkley – Marion Berry – Judy Biggert – Brian Bilbray – Gus Bilirakis – Sanford Bishop – Marsha Blackburn – Roy Blunt – John Boehner – Jo Bonner – Mary Bono Mack – John Boozman – Dan Boren – Leon Boswell – Charles Boustany – Allen Boyd – Bob Brady – Kevin Brady – Bobby Bright – Paul Broun – Henry Brown – Corrine Brown – Ginny Brown-Waite – Vern Buchanan – Mike Burgess – Dan Burton – G. K. Butterfield – Steve Buyer – Ken Calvert – Dave Camp – John Campbell – Eric Cantor – Joseph Cao – Shelly Capito – Dennis Cardoza – Russ Carnahan – Chris Carney – Andre Carson – John Carter – Bill Cassidy – Mike Castle – Kathy Castor – Ben Chandler – Travis Childers – William Lacy Clay – Jim Clyburn – Howard Coble – Mike Coffman – Tom Cole – Mike Conaway – Gerry Connolly – John Conyers – Jim Cooper – Jim Costa – Joe Courtney – Ander Crenshaw – Henry Cuellar – John Culberson – Kathleen Dahlkemper – Artur Davis – Susan Davis – Danny Davis – Geoff Davis – Lincoln Davis – Diana DeGette – William Delahunt – Rosa DeLauro – Lincoln Diaz-Balart – Mario Diaz-Balart – Norm Dicks – Joe Donnelly, Mike Doyle – David Dreier – Steve Driehaus – Chet Edwards – Brad Ellsworth – Jo Ann Emerson – Anna Eshoo – Bob Etheridge – Chaka Fattah – Jeff Flake – John Fleming – Randy Forbes – Jeff Fortenberry – Bill Foster – Virginia Foxx – Trent Franks – Rodney Frelinghuysen – Elton Gallegly – John Garamendi – Scott Garrett – Jim Gerlach – Gabrielle Giffords – Louie Gohmert – Charles Gonzalez – Bob Goodlatte – Bart Gordon – Kay Granger – Sam Graves – Alan Grayson – Gene Green – Parker Griffith – Brett Guthrie – Luis Gutierrez – John Hall – Deborah Halvorson – Greg Harper – Doc Hastings – Martin Heinrich – Jeb Hensarling – Wally Herger – Stephanie Herseth Sandlin – Brian Higgins – Baron Hill – James Himes – Ruben Hinojosa – Paul Hodes – Peter Hoekstra – Tim Holden – Steny Hoyer – Duncan Hunter – Bob Inglis – Jay Inslee – Steve Israel – Darrel Issa – Jesse Jackson – Sheila Jackson Lee – Lynn Jenkins – Eddie Bernice Johnson – Sam Johnson – Jim Jordan, Paul Kanjorski – Marcy Kaptur – Patrick Kennedy – Dale Kildee – Carolyn Kilpatrick – Mary Jo Kilroy – Ron Kind – Steve King – Peter King – Jack Kingston – Mark Kirk – Ann Kirkpatrick – Larry Kissell – Ron Klein – John Kline – Suzanne Kosmas – Frank Kratovil – Doug Lamborn – Leonard Lance – James Langevin – Rick Larsen – Tom Latham – Steven LaTourette – Bob Latta – Chris Lee – Sander Levin – Jerry Lewis – John Linder – Dan Lipinski – Frank LoBiondo – Zoe Lofgren – Nita Lowey – Frank Lucas – Blaine Luetkemeyer – Cynthia Lummis – Dan Lungren – Stephen Lynch – Don Manzullo – Kenny Marchant – Betsy Markey – Jim Marshall – Eric Massa – Jim Matheson – Kevin McCarthy – Carolyn McCarthy – Mike McCaul – Tom McClintock – Thad McCotter – Patrick McHenry – Mike McIntyre – Buck McKeon – Mike McMahon – Cathy McMorris Rodgers – Jerry McNerney – Kendrick Meek – Charles Melancon – John Mica – Jeff Miller – Candice Miller – Brad Miller – Gary Miller – Harry Mitchell – Alan Mollohan – Dennis Moore – Jerry Moran – James Moran – Chris Murphy – Scott Murphy – Patrick Murphy – Tim Murphy – Grace Napolitano – Randy Neugebauer – Devin Nunes – Glenn Nye – Dave Obey – Peter Olson – Solomon Ortiz – Bill Owens – Bill Pascrell – Erik Paulsen – Mike Pence – Ed Perlmutter – Gary Peters – Collin Peterson – Tom Petri – Todd Platts – Ted Poe – Earl Pomeroy – Bill Posey – Adam Putnam – Mike Quigley – Nick Rahall – Charles Rangel – Denny Rehberg – Silvestre Reyes – Ciro Rodriguez – David Roe – Mike Rogers – Harold Rogers – Mike Rogers – Dana Rohrabacher – Tom Rooney – Ileana Ros-Lehtinen – Peter Roskam – Mike Ross – Steve Rothman – Lucille Roybal-Allard – Ed Royce – Dutch Ruppersberger – Bobby Rush – Paul Ryan – John Salazar – Steve Scalise – Mark Schauer – Adam Schiff – Jean Schmidt – Aaron Schock – Kurt Schrader – Allyson Schwartz – David Scott – James Sensenbrenner – Pete Sessions – Joe Sestak – John Shadegg – John Shimkus – Heath Shuler – Bill Shuster – Mike Simpson – Albio Sires – Ike Skelton – Louise Slaughter – Adrian Smith – Christopher Smith – Lamar Smith – Adam Smith – Vic Snyder – Souder – Zack Space – John Spratt – Cliff Stearns – Betty Sutton – John Tanner – Gene Taylor – Harry Teague – Lee Terry – Bennie Thompson – Glenn Thompson – Mac Thornberry – Todd Tiahrt – Patrick Tiberi – Dina Titus – Paul Tonko – Niki Tsongas – Michael Turner – Fred Upton – Chris Van Hollen – Greg Walden – Tim Walz – Zach Wamp – Debbie Wasserman Schultz – Diane Watson – Anthony Weiner – Ed Whitfield – Charles Wilson – Rob Wittman – Frank Wolf – John Yarmuth – Bill Young